Community

community

Rethinking Third Party Comment Systems

A year and a half ago I weighed in on third party commenting systems. My message? Avoid them. It's time to rethink that position. Here's why. Social technology has changed alot since then. At the time of my original post there were fewer compelling reasons to use outside systems. For the most part the added value of those systems came in the form of additional features (like threaded comments for example) that the native comment systems of WordPress and Drupal didn't have. Since then WordPress and Drupal have both added threaded commenting to their core software as I knew they would. But something else has happened since.

A number of compelling identity systems have emerged. Facebook, Twitter, and Google have launched APIs (application programming interfaces) that allow 3rd party software to connect with their sites, access profile information and post content. As a result of this development website owners have a new authentication option for visitors to their site. Instead of having people verify their identity by setting up a new account, they can login with an existing profile. Beyond that, when visitors make comments they can push notifications about the comments back to the service of their choice. So they can let their network know about your site when they make a comment. These types of features really expand the possibilities for people to discover your website and are also likely to increase engagement since people can quickly make comments without having to create a new account. All good stuff.

While systems like WordPress and Drupal have modules that support these types of plugins the support for them is a bit spotty. For example, I've gotten Google Friend Connect working on my Learn By The Drop site. Unfortunately I've had to implement a workaround to the module because the initial release hasn't been updated. There are other modules that offer connection to Twitter, Facebook and Google for all the major open source systems but there always seems to be a catch. Either you have to rely on yet another service provider (in the case of Gigya Socialize) or you need to install multiple modules (that don't necessarily play nice with each other) in order to to take advantage of all the services. Dropping in a third party commenting system is one way to get around those issues.

Right now there are three major players in the comment space, Disqus, IntenseDebate and Echo (formerly known as JS-Kit). IntenseDebate is owned by Automattic which runs the WordPress.com service. Based on my research it actually looks like Disqus and Echo are the more promising options for dropping in a new comment system on your site. I've seen some negative comments about Intense Debate. My friend Neville Hobson in the UK tried it and lost confidence in the service. It also appears that IntenseDebate does not currently appear to support Google Friend Connect. Meanwhile both Echo and Disqus have had high profile system enhancements that make those services very effective. I've posted a quick screencast below that shows how those two services work.

While there are some nice benefits of outsourcing your comments there are also some drawbacks. First off, since you're embedding a system running on another server then if that server goes down it could take your site down or at the very least take down your comments for the length of the outage. A slow server on their part will slow your site down as well. Both of those things can really kill activity on your site. Of late it seems like the services mentioned here have performed well but you never know. There's also the issue of retaining existing comments and taking comments with you if you leave. I know that Disqus does a good job with retaining all of your comments. Echo will import comments and keep the Echo comments synced with your native commenting system in the background. So both of these services sound like they make it easy to switch back if you don't like them.

Disqus and IntenseDebate are free whereas Echo costs $12 a year and you can go "white label" with Echo for $48 per year. Many people are put off by having to pay for social services such as this but you have to consider that a source of revenue means something. Companies that charge are more likely to continue upgrading their services to satisfy their paying customers. This assumes that the service is a quality one that works well. Both Disqus and Echo meet that criteria. The jury is still out for me on IntenseDebate.

Lessons For Young Entrepreneurs

There was a time not so long ago when the conventional wisdom in the world of tech revolved around youth above all else. If you look back a decade to the dot-com bubble you'll see many companies whose management philosophy revolved largely around the belief that youth and inexperience were a key ingredient required for a successful tech startup. We now know that this philosophy was extremely flawed.  Age and experience do count for something when running a business. And anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool.

Fast forward to this week when I decided, for better or worse, weigh in on a very small controversy about a site called Teens In Tech. Teens In Tech is a WordPress MU powered group blog started by a teenager named Daniel Brusilovsky. I knew about Teens In Tech because it has received coverage on TechCrunch. Teens In Tech, according to TechCrunch, is a "startup...with a board of advisers that includes Robert Scoble and Loic Le Meur." Some pretty heavy hitters there as far as advisors go. More recently Daniel announced the addition of  a person named Louis Gray to his Board of Advisors. So we've got a startup covered by TechCrunch, a heavy hitting Board of Advisors and a young man with big dreams for his company. Could be a recipe for great success...or not. I took a look at it when I first heard about the site and I wasn't impressed. It was a standard WordPress MU install with very little content. Then I forgot about it.

In any case a blog post surfaced this week on a site called Net News Daily indicating that Teens In Tech had been hacked revealing in the process that activity on the site was quite anemic with something like 400 users, 150 of which didn't appear to be active. The writer of the article thought that didn't square with Daniel's assertion of "10,000 regular subscribers" to Teens In Tech on a YouTube video interview. I took a stroll over to the Teens In Tech site to see what was up and really didn't like what I saw. As I perused the site I noticed the lack of content, an "advertise with us" banner that links to the home page and just a general lack of community. Knowing that it was up to a 15-year old to maintain the site I could understand it. I was 15 once, trying all sorts of things with the limited computer technology that was available then. But then again I didn't call myself a CEO and I didn't have a board of advisors made up of the top Silicon Valley tech bloggers. I wondered what role the advisors played in the current state of the site.